Biological evolution is descent with modification.

This definition encompasses small-scale evolution (changes in gene frequency in a population from one generation to the next) and large-scale evolution (the descent of different species from a common ancestor over many generations).

Evolution helps us to understand the history of life.

While evolution is very widely accepted, many people hold to misconceptions about it.

This list should help to dispel some of those myths.



15. Evolution is a theory about the origin of life

The theory of evolution primarily deals with the manner in which life has changed after its origin.

While science is interested in the origins of life (for example the composition of the primeval sludge from which life might have come) but these are not issues covered in the area of evolution.

What is known is that regardless of the start, at some point life began to branch off.

Evolution is, therefore, dedicated to the study of those processes.


14. Organisms are always getting better

071210 Evolution Hmed2P.Hmedium

While it is a fact that natural selection weeds out unhealthy genes from the gene pool, there are many cases where an imperfect organism has survived.

Some examples of this are fungi, sharks, crayfish, and mosses - these have all remained essentially the same over a great period of time.

These organisms are all sufficiently adapted to their environment to survive without improvement.

Other taxa have changed a lot, but not necessarily for the better.

Some creatures have had their environments changed and their adaptations may not be as well suited to their new situation.

Fitness is linked to their environment, not to progress.



13. Evolution means that life changed ‘by chance’

In fact, natural selection is not random.

Many aquatic animals need speed to survive and reproduce - the creatures with that ability are more suited to their environment and are more likely to survive natural selection. In turn, they will produce more offspring with the same traits and the cycle continues.

The idea that evolution occurs by chance does not take the entire picture in to account.



12. Natural selection involves organisms ‘trying’ to adapt

A103 Human Evolution Poster

Organisms do not “try” to adapt - it is natural selection that enables various members of a group to survive and reproduce.

Genetic adaptation is entirely outside of the power of the developing organism.



11. Natural selection gives organisms what they ‘need.’

Natural selection has no “intelligence” - it can not tell what a species needs.

If a population has genetic variants that are more suited to their environment, they will reproduce more in the next generation and the population will evolve.

If a genetic variant is not present, the population will most likely do - or it will survive with little evolutionary change.



10. Evolution is ‘just’ a theory

Dinosaur Evolution Poster

Scientifically speaking, a theory is a well substantiated idea that explains aspects of the natural world.

Unfortunately other definitions of theory (such as a “guess” or a “hunch”) cause a great deal of confusion in the non-scientific world when dealing with the sciences.

They are, in fact, two very different concepts.



9. Evolution is a Theory in Crisis

There is no debate in science as to whether or not evolution occurred - there is, however, debate over how it happened.

The minutiae of the process is vigorously debated which can cause anti-evolutionists to believe that the theory is in crisis.

Evolution is sound science and is treated as such by scientists worldwide.



8. Gaps in the Fossil Record Disprove Evolution

Evolution Of Whales

Actually, many transitional fossils do exist - for example, there are fossils of transitional organisms between modern birds and their dinosaur ancestors, as well as whales and their land mammal ancestors.

There are many transitional forms that have not been preserved, but that is simply because some organisms do not fossilize well or exist in conditions that do not allow for the process of fossilization.

Science predicts that there will be gaps in the record for many evolutionary changes. This does not disprove the theory.



7. Evolutionary Theory is Incomplete

Evolutionary science is a work in progress. Science is constantly making new discoveries with regard to it and explanations are always adjusted if necessary.

Evolutionary theory is like all of the other sciences in this respect. Science is always trying to improve our knowledge.

At present, evolution is the only well-supported explanation for all of life’s diversity.



6. The Theory is Flawed

Evolution-Diagram Op 800X467

Science is an extremely competitive field - if any flaws were discovered in evolutionary theory they would be quickly corrected.

All of the alleged flaws that creationists put forth have been investigated careful by scientists and they simply do not hold water.

They are usually based on misunderstandings of the theory or misrepresentation of the evidence.



5. Evolution is not science because it is not observable

Evolution is observable and testable. The confusion here is that people think science is limited to experiments in laboratories by white-coated technicians.

In fact, a large amount of scientific information is gathered from the real world.

Astronomers can obviously not physically touch the objects they study (for example stars and galaxies), yet a great deal of knowledge can be gained through multiple lines of study. This is true also of evolution.

It is also true that there are many mechanisms of evolution that can be, and are studied through direct experimentation as with other sciences.



4. Most Biologists have rejected Darwinism


Scientists do not reject Darwin’s theories, they have modified it over time as more knowledge has been discovered.

Darwin considered that evolution proceeds at a deliberate, slow pace - but in fact it has now been discovered that it can proceed at a rapid pace under some circumstances.

There has not been, so far, a credible challenge to the basic principles of Darwin’s theory.

Scientists have improved and expanded on Darwin’s original theory of natural selection - it has not been rejected, it has been added to.



3. Evolution Leads to Immoral Behavior

All animal species have a set of behaviors that they share with other members of their species.

Slugs act like slugs, dogs act like dogs, and humans act like humans. It is preposterous to presume that a child will begin to behave like another creature when they discover that they are related to them.

It is nonsensical to link evolution to immoral or inappropriate behavior.



2. Evolution Supports “Might Makes Right”


In the 19th and early 20th century, a philosophy called “Social Darwinism” sprung up from misguided attempts to apply biological evolution to society.

This philosophy said that society should allow the weak to fail and die, and that not only is this an ideal situation, but a morally right one.

This enabled prejudices to be rationalized and ideas such as the poor deserved their situation due to being less fit were very popular.

This was a misappropriation of science. Social Darwinism has, thankfully, been repudiated. Biological evolution has not.



1. Teachers Should Teach Both Sides

There are tens of thousands of different religious views concerning creation. It is simply impossible for all of these views to be presented.

Furthermore, none of the theories are based in science and therefore have no place in a science classroom.

In a science class, students can debate where a creature branched off in the tree of life, but it is not right to argue a religious belief in a science class.

The “fairness” argument is often used by groups attempting to inject their religious dogmas in to the scientific curricula.


Article Info & Options:
Date: 24 Apr 2009 | Author: mesmerX | Category: News | Views: 20914

» TrackBack
» Print

Enojyed this article? Share it and let others know:

Comments: 11

Human Ape
From a previous comment "Why can't people understand, the Bible never truly tells HOW God created everything. Who's to say that he didn't use evolution to create all the living organisms on our planet?"

That's a childish idea. It's like saying "Who is to say a god fairy doesn't use gravity to keep creatures from floating up into space?"

Natural processes like natural selection don't need supernatural users.

Your magic god fairy is not necessary for anything and in any case it's idiotic to pretend there's magic, also known as god, in the universe.

By the way, you used the word "he". Does your god fairy have male sex organs?

darwinkilledgod dot blogspot dot com

i think its was an important point at the start of the article that the theory of evolution deals more with how life evolved once it was there rather than the origins of life.While darwins theory seems the likely mechanism in which life forms evolve it in no way explains satisfactorily how life itself originated.An equasion was worked out to estimate the likelyhood of life occuring given all the possible parameters such as the time of 100,s of millions of years and based on the accepted model. The equasion came out with figure that represented such magnitude of unlikelyhood that to all intents and purposes it was impossible.In other words the the theory of how the accidental interlocking of molecules that caused the first cells is extremely far fetched and unlikely according to real science.Therefore it is a theory often taught as fact with suprisingly little scientific facts supporting the primordial origin of living cells themselves.Therefore Darwinism and evolutionary theory is a bit red herring when it comes to actual origin of life as it does not prove much of that which it proports to ie explaining the origin of life.

The issue is there are very real problems with the theory of evolution. Darwin himself said the number of transitional forms should be "inconceivably great". In fact, if you have read his book you realize that almost every form should be a transitional form. His theory was that all this happened very gradually. Even if creationists grant you the weak attempts at computer images of transitional forms, no honest scientist can say the number of forms are "inconceivably great" or "innumerable" as Darwin says elsewhere in his book. Yet many scientist will not even admit this is a problem However, it is such a proble that Stephen Jay Gould created a new theory to address it. Punctuated equilibrium is an attempt to answer the fossil record dilemma. All I ask for is honesty. Also, to begin researching the origin of life while at the same time stating you will not settle for the explanation that an intelligent designer created it (I am not saying God so don't panic) is not proper science and those of you that have intelligence know that. Yet that is exactly what scientists have done. Read through almost any biology textbook from your favorite college and you will see what I mean. If you are truly going to study the origin of life you must be open-minded and let the evidence lead you where it will. The truth is that any argument you make to support evolution could be made to support a single intellegent designer that used the same materials to create his masterpieces, similar to the way any art expert can tell you who the artist is based on the similarities. Please answer me honestly, "Is it at all possible that we were created by something?"


this article is awesome. thank u very much... i must say that i didn't know many facts about evolution.
I believe ONLY in SCIENCE, and nothing else, 'cause science is enough, in fact it's everything...

this is awsome im doing a report on evolution and this is great for informatio laughing

Why can't people understand, the Bible never truly tells HOW God created everything. Who's to say that he didn't use evolution to create all the living organisms on our planet? I believe somewhere in the Bible it says something like "men were created from the dust", I see that as a perfect early-century description of evolution, saying that we (men) came from the dust (possibly the primeval sludge?). Either way, it all makes sense to me. Evolution is not a religion, Christianity is not a scientific theory.

er...supachezzy, catholics are christians.

wassat wait........ what?

KLG is completly right. people obvisouly evolve. along with other animals. im 12 and i still understand that God or some kind of unseen force controls it or even the Earth itself. THANK GOD IM NOT CATHLIC! I COULD NEVER FOLLOW ALL THOOSE RULES! ( im cristian)

I dont understand people who dont believe in evolution. How stupid! Look at the proof people! For those of you who are smart enough to realize that it did happen cheers to you

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright Message

© 2015